Biological and traditional

The slide below – photographed at last year’s sherryfest during a masterclass by the great Cesar Saldana – is probably the best summary I have seen of the effects of biological vs oxidative or “traditional” ageing.

In biological ageing, the living flor protects the wine from the oxygen in the air and steadily eats away at the alcohol, sugar  and glycerine, reducing the volatile acids and leaving behind the hangover inducing Acetaldehydes. The result is “fino” – fine, potent, dry wine with bready, nutty flavours.

In “traditional” ageing, these gears go into reverse. Residual alcohol, glycerine and sugar all increase as evaporation (the angels taking their share) does its work, and colour and volatile acids increase due to the interaction of the wine with air and oak barrel. Now the result is oloroso: a fragrant (oloroso literally means “smelly”), acidic, caramel flavoured wine.

And of course the great thing about jerez is that in some wines both processes are used: in a palo cortado there are a few months of biological ageing followed by a longer spell in the open air, and in an amontillado a longer spell of biological ageing (up to 7 or 8 years in some cases) followed by a good stretch of oxidation. The results can be spectacular.

Advertisements

One thought on “Biological and traditional

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s